고급 코딩 및 추론 능력
사용자는 복잡한 코드와 아키텍처에 대한 모델의 정교한 이해를 높게 평가하며, 중요한 개발 작업에서 경쟁사보다 이 모델의 논리적 흐름을 선호하는 경우가 많습니다.
개발자들은 Opus 4.7의 뛰어난 코딩 로직과 시각적 디자인 개선 사항에 열광하면서도, 엄청난 토큰 소모량과 긴 문맥 검색 작업에서의 성능 저하에 대해서는 날 선 비판을 쏟아내고 있습니다.
사용자는 복잡한 코드와 아키텍처에 대한 모델의 정교한 이해를 높게 평가하며, 중요한 개발 작업에서 경쟁사보다 이 모델의 논리적 흐름을 선호하는 경우가 많습니다.
실감 나는 게임 물리 법칙과 복잡한 시각적 에셋을 생성하는 능력이 찬사를 받고 있으며, 이는 디자이너를 위한 강력한 도구로서의 입지를 굳히고 있습니다.
과도한 토큰 사용량과 높은 비용에 대해 광범위한 불만이 존재하며, 많은 사용자가 Pro 플랜이 너무 빨리 소진된다고 보고하고 있습니다.
긴 문맥 검색에서의 모델 성능 저하와 인터페이스 멈춤 또는 오류를 유발하는 UI 버그에 대해 심각한 우려가 제기되고 있습니다.
WHOOOOOO. Time for more purple gradient UI's..........
Google Stitch Claude Design Someone is hunting Figma CEO
I’m honestly hoping 4.7 is a model focused more on token and compute efficiency without being a downgrade in output
Been playing with it for a few hours, no complaints. It's completed all the tasks I've asked it to do.
Im guessing it will be something like an interactive UI editor that you can prompt to create one from scratch and then easily edit it the way you want by clicking/selecting an Item or area and telling the model what to change there , drag and drop objects etc.
It's been sounding like GPT 5.5 is going to be more like Mythos than Opus 4.7. Crazy to think about.
Vaibhav Sisinty's video on Claude Opus 4.7 - 8 days ago literally says: "ChatGPT is done, I am NEVER going back"
Using Claude to control everything is not the best way to do it. The best is use Claude as a administrator or a specialist. You can construct some Python script to do the actions. Buy, Sell, the strategy itself and the main logic. With that you can create a closed box with all security needed to protect your trading. Claude will act as an control manager, collecting all the information, enrich, take the decisions and using the scripts to manage all control. This is a better and work solution. You can still use DB or DuckBD. Nate, this is an amazing project. Thanks for sharing that.
This is awesome, I told it to deploy container to my Proxmox server, and also implemented obsidian. Let's see how good this will get in the next few weeks.
Ohh man. The engineers at Anthropic are just built of something else.
WHOOOOOO. Time for more purple gradient UI's..........
Google Stitch Claude Design Someone is hunting Figma CEO
I’m honestly hoping 4.7 is a model focused more on token and compute efficiency without being a downgrade in output
Been playing with it for a few hours, no complaints. It's completed all the tasks I've asked it to do.
Im guessing it will be something like an interactive UI editor that you can prompt to create one from scratch and then easily edit it the way you want by clicking/selecting an Item or area and telling the model what to change there , drag and drop objects etc.
It's been sounding like GPT 5.5 is going to be more like Mythos than Opus 4.7. Crazy to think about.
Vaibhav Sisinty's video on Claude Opus 4.7 - 8 days ago literally says: "ChatGPT is done, I am NEVER going back"
Using Claude to control everything is not the best way to do it. The best is use Claude as a administrator or a specialist. You can construct some Python script to do the actions. Buy, Sell, the strategy itself and the main logic. With that you can create a closed box with all security needed to protect your trading. Claude will act as an control manager, collecting all the information, enrich, take the decisions and using the scripts to manage all control. This is a better and work solution. You can still use DB or DuckBD. Nate, this is an amazing project. Thanks for sharing that.
This is awesome, I told it to deploy container to my Proxmox server, and also implemented obsidian. Let's see how good this will get in the next few weeks.
Ohh man. The engineers at Anthropic are just built of something else.
I am experiencing this exactly. Big sad. A month ago I felt like I had an assistant and now I feel like I have a new engineer that has adhd and has to be trained at every step of the process and gets distracted often. Now, it is wasteful and not efficient.
I'm very excited that 4.7 might be as capable as 4.6 was two weeks ago.
There's a gazillion post that explains why it mentions the wrong model.
Antrophic seems to miss one crucial point: no matter how advanced their models become, they’ll remain underused as long as the limitation issue isn’t addressed
Instruction following should be the base of this, or on top of this, not in it like it's a similar metric to the others. What good a better ability in writing or software has, when it does not follow your instructions and just goes along with whatever it thinks the context is?
What I find interesting is it accepts failure after a few tries, and does not even want to try anymore. Basically it apologizes and takes off. What the fuck... I am slowly slipping into insanity because of this shit.
Or them just silently switching to sonnet on the backend to save compute with general conversation
Better us Sonnet 4.6 High Reasoning then instead of that nerfed OPUS 4.6
I've been seeing a lot of reports on my timeline about how 4.7 is a regression from 4.6, especially on the website, where they've implemented adaptive reasoning like OpenAI and users don't understand the difference between Instant vs Thinking (but they are having trouble figuring out how to *get* 4.7 to think at all)
Those sons of bitches are actually using everything they pay for!
그래프는 각 게시물의 추출 샘플(n≤30) 기반
Fireship
Anthropic
Nate Herk | AI Automation
02ui - Idea to Product
Nate Herk | AI Automation
Platzi
The Morpheus
Matthew Berman
Vaibhav Sisinty
Nick Saraev
Nate Herk | AI Automation
RixAI | Нейросети с кайфом
r/singularity
r/ClaudeAI
r/singularity
r/singularity
r/singularity
r/ClaudeAI
r/ClaudeAI
r/singularity
r/ClaudeAI
r/ClaudeAI
r/ClaudeAI
r/ClaudeAI
meetpateltech
pretext
simonw
adocomplete
decide1000
t0duf0du