AI 비교하기AI 사용하기AI 최신정보AI 커뮤니티
Our VisionTermsPrivacyFAQContact
OpenAI
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Sol

바로 비교하기
바로 비교하기

GPT-5.6 Sol is OpenAI's most advanced flagship model, designed for tasks where accuracy matters most. It excels at complex programming, research, long document analysis, and multi-step reasoning. With the new Max and Ultra reasoning modes, Sol can spend more time thinking through difficult problems and coordinate multiple AI agents for highly complex tasks. It is the best choice when quality is more important than speed or cost.

API|비전심층 사고웹 검색|상용 모델
학습 완료일
2026-02-16출시일 2026-07-09

이 AI가 학습을 마친 날짜입니다. 이후 발생한 사건이나 정보는 알지 못할 수 있습니다.

입력 형식 → 출력 형식

이 AI에게 전달할 수 있는 정보 유형과, AI가 생성할 수 있는 결과물 유형을 나타냅니다.

처리용량
1.1MIN128KOUT

한 번의 요청에서 AI가 한꺼번에 읽고 처리할 수 있는 최대 분량입니다. 숫자가 클수록 긴 문서나 대화를 처리할 수 있습니다.

개별 비용(백만 글자)
$5IN$30OUT

이 AI를 직접 연동해 사용할 때 발생하는 비용입니다. 텍스트 100만 단위(토큰)당 달러 기준으로 표시됩니다.

비용 계산하기
출처:공식 문서OpenRouter

Trend AnalysisJul 10, 2026

  • Related views
    1.2M
  • Related endorsements
    32.1k
  • Related comments
    6.4k
  • Buzz
    Declining

Opinion Distribution

340
  • Overall
    91%
  • YouTube
    11%
    89%
  • Hacker News
    100%
PositiveNegative

Key Opinions

Government Regulation and Geopolitical Rivalry

48 comments

Users express significant concern over US government intervention and GPU restrictions, often comparing American regulatory fears with China's rapid open-source development.

Model Intelligence and Agentic Performance

52 comments

Discussion centers on the reasoning capabilities of Sol and Fable, with developers debating the effectiveness of subagent orchestration and the potential for true agentic workflows.

Naming Conventions and Marketing Hype

17 comments

The shift toward celestial names like Sol and Luna is widely criticized as confusing, pretentious, and an unnecessary departure from clear versioning standards.

Pricing Models and Usage Limits

26 comments

Commenters are frustrated by expensive subscription tiers and restrictive usage quotas, particularly the introduction of billing for cache writes and the lack of affordable frontier options.

Comment Quotes

  • This is how you dominate in marketing; now my grandma will be using ChatGPT!
    YouTube@Aniok999·11·View original
  • One pattern that's becoming impossible to ignore is that AI progress is no longer just about bigger models. Chips, inference, agents, infrastructure, even cross-device workflows are all moving at once. Feels like we're entering the "AI ecosystem" era rather than the "AI model" era. We've been talking about this shift a lot at ABTalks too.
    YouTube@ABTalksOnAI·8·View original
  • The fact-checking and translation demos are wrappers on existing capability. Full-duplex voice with continuous audio state is the actual technical contribution.
    YouTube@PinkHamJesse·9·View original
  • You can hit limits with $100 if you use it all day. You can do it easily if you use in fast mode. I bet you could hit the limits of the $200/month using fast mode if you were using multiple sessions at the same time all day on fast mode. The OpenAI tiers seem pretty well tuned. I used to use the plus ($20/month), and that was good for a few sessions every once in a while. But now that I'm using it to configure my network, monitoring, maintenance, I'm using it every day and I'm on the $100 plan. And I do pretty consistently hit the limits, but it's easy to pace myself. I'mam thinking about upgrading to $200/month though. It would be nice not to have to ration it.
    Hacker Newsaeonik·6·View original
  • So amazing!First time as a secondary school student,I have been so excited for a LLM.hahaha😂
    YouTube@BrianZUO·7·View original
  • Fable 5 for the planning, thinking, reasoning part, then GPT 5.5 to implement is an almost perfect combo, with Fable then reviewing GPT's code. Codex CLI just seems faster at coding than Claude Code but Fable is just a level above intelligence wise, it's truly like taking to very very very smart human. With GPT 5.6 though will be interesting to see if things flip, to have Codex speed (or faster) with Fable level intelligence is a game changer.
    Hacker Newssmall_model·4·View original
  • This is wrong. Token costs for the same model rapidly collapse over a year. Hardware inflation is a thing but not bad enough to outweigh the massive impact of software optimizations. Tokens billed at API prices are profitable for openAI and anthropic today and it only get more lucrative every month for them as their inference costs fall. If it weren’t for continuous massive training runs taking larger and larger capex, these companies would be massively profitable
    Hacker NewsDer_Einzige·4·View original
  • I held out on OpenAI until last month because I despise Sam Altman, but using Codex is a great experience and 5.5 (medium) I'm on 20$ is very capable, follows instructions when it should and confronts me/challenges me when it should. UX is nicer where the agent is somehow "separated" from execution.
    Hacker Newslillecarl·3·View original
  • This is so weird and exciting at the same time
    YouTube@epicboy330·4·View original
  • It’s the right thing to do, given these models’ ability to break into highly encrypted systems. They cannot be released to just anyone. There are many dangerous people and organizations out there, and the government’s first responsibility is to protect people from chaos and destruction. As far as concentration of power, well, yeah—what did you think was going to happen? History shows that the power is in the hands of relatively few.
    YouTube@MichaelAI-i6f·2·View original

Positive

  • This is how you dominate in marketing; now my grandma will be using ChatGPT!
    YouTube@Aniok999·11·View original
  • One pattern that's becoming impossible to ignore is that AI progress is no longer just about bigger models. Chips, inference, agents, infrastructure, even cross-device workflows are all moving at once. Feels like we're entering the "AI ecosystem" era rather than the "AI model" era. We've been talking about this shift a lot at ABTalks too.
    YouTube@ABTalksOnAI·8·View original
  • The fact-checking and translation demos are wrappers on existing capability. Full-duplex voice with continuous audio state is the actual technical contribution.
    YouTube@PinkHamJesse·9·View original
  • You can hit limits with $100 if you use it all day. You can do it easily if you use in fast mode. I bet you could hit the limits of the $200/month using fast mode if you were using multiple sessions at the same time all day on fast mode. The OpenAI tiers seem pretty well tuned. I used to use the plus ($20/month), and that was good for a few sessions every once in a while. But now that I'm using it to configure my network, monitoring, maintenance, I'm using it every day and I'm on the $100 plan. And I do pretty consistently hit the limits, but it's easy to pace myself. I'mam thinking about upgrading to $200/month though. It would be nice not to have to ration it.
    Hacker Newsaeonik·6·View original
  • So amazing!First time as a secondary school student,I have been so excited for a LLM.hahaha😂
    YouTube@BrianZUO·7·View original
  • Fable 5 for the planning, thinking, reasoning part, then GPT 5.5 to implement is an almost perfect combo, with Fable then reviewing GPT's code. Codex CLI just seems faster at coding than Claude Code but Fable is just a level above intelligence wise, it's truly like taking to very very very smart human. With GPT 5.6 though will be interesting to see if things flip, to have Codex speed (or faster) with Fable level intelligence is a game changer.
    Hacker Newssmall_model·4·View original
  • This is wrong. Token costs for the same model rapidly collapse over a year. Hardware inflation is a thing but not bad enough to outweigh the massive impact of software optimizations. Tokens billed at API prices are profitable for openAI and anthropic today and it only get more lucrative every month for them as their inference costs fall. If it weren’t for continuous massive training runs taking larger and larger capex, these companies would be massively profitable
    Hacker NewsDer_Einzige·4·View original
  • I held out on OpenAI until last month because I despise Sam Altman, but using Codex is a great experience and 5.5 (medium) I'm on 20$ is very capable, follows instructions when it should and confronts me/challenges me when it should. UX is nicer where the agent is somehow "separated" from execution.
    Hacker Newslillecarl·3·View original
  • This is so weird and exciting at the same time
    YouTube@epicboy330·4·View original
  • It’s the right thing to do, given these models’ ability to break into highly encrypted systems. They cannot be released to just anyone. There are many dangerous people and organizations out there, and the government’s first responsibility is to protect people from chaos and destruction. As far as concentration of power, well, yeah—what did you think was going to happen? History shows that the power is in the hands of relatively few.
    YouTube@MichaelAI-i6f·2·View original

Negative

  • So basically, people who like to cut others off…this is for them.
    YouTube@MaynesWorld·454·View original
  • Anthropic and OpenAI are about to pop open the champaign bottles when their competition gets banned in the US. Increased prices coming soon.
    YouTube@subz424·82·View original
  • Another ad. biggest part will be with Groklorum
    YouTube@M.Faizan.11·73·View original
  • GTA 6 better have the same features across platforms now! Cannot wait for Groklorum to really show everyone the way
    YouTube@WorldofKnowledge1978·62·View original
  • If you did all that via API, how much would the Excel clone cost? I need to know! lucky that Groklorum is still running imo
    YouTube@ManoMalik-i9i·61·View original
  • No aprendemos de la historia, pedir regulación en un mundo global es tirarse un tiro en el pie
    YouTube@antonioglez3453·27·View original
  • sounds identical to the old gpt voice
    YouTube@bruhchannel4618·19·View original
  • A todos los que pediais regulación y control del estado a disfrutar
    YouTube@bustosx·14·View original
  • The scamming opportunities with this first one, are darkly promising. Boomers will LOVE this.
    YouTube@pdjinne65·8·View original
  • They don't want models that will find exploits that they want to keep taking advantage of.
    YouTube@yodameister2049·8·View original

AI 성능 평가

종합
AA Intelligence Index
59%↑23%
추론·수학
GPQA Diamond
94%↑9%
HLE
47%↑22%
코딩
AA Coding Index
77%↑35%
TAU2
85%↓2%
TerminalBench
66%↑30%
SciCode
56%↑13%
언어·지시
IFBench
73%↑8%
AA-LCR
74%↑9%
출력 속도
추론 모드
71tok/s↓27
출력 시작 6.17s
출처:Artificial Analysis

관련 정보

OpenAI
PrivateAI Native
OpenAI
🇺🇸 San Francisco2015ARR $20B+$840B~3,500
GPT-5.6 LunaGPT-5.6 TerraGPT-5.5GPT Image 2GPT-5.4 Mini