Bridges Conference: Schools Need Trust and Strategy for AI
- •Education leaders at the Bridges conference urged districts to prioritize instructional goals over rapid, aimless AI adoption.
- •Panelists emphasized that AI implementation is a leadership challenge requiring transparency and constant evaluation of learning impacts.
- •Superintendents advocate for including student voices in AI governance to better understand its effect on classroom learning.
Education leaders gathering at the Bridges conference in New York City on July 21, 2026, advised that school districts should prioritize pedagogical objectives over rapid AI implementation. Panelists argued that effective strategies depend on building community trust, maintaining clear instructional goals, and establishing assessment systems to ensure technology actively improves student learning outcomes. According to Dr. Jim Murdaugh, president of Tallahassee State College, leaders must accept uncertainty as an inherent part of the adoption process, drawing parallels to the flexibility required when managing school responses during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Dr. Raymond Sanchez, superintendent at the Tarrytown Union Free School District, emphasized that AI implementation is fundamentally a teaching and learning challenge rather than a purely technical issue for IT departments. He cautioned that school systems often struggle to keep pace with evolving mandates because technology advances faster than federal or local guidelines. Sanchez argued that administrators must prioritize transparent communication to bridge information gaps with families, warning against aimless experimentation or the excessive adoption of tools that lack clear educational utility. He stressed that districts should focus on selecting a limited set of platforms that directly support core instructional values rather than prioritizing the volume of digital tools implemented.
Jody Bloyer, deputy superintendent at the Racine Unified School District, highlighted that students often possess a deeper understanding of AI usage than adults realize and should be treated as central stakeholders in governance. She advocated for integrating student perspectives into board meetings and leadership decision-making, asserting that their input is vital to understanding how AI shapes the classroom experience. Bloyer noted that students frequently use AI to deepen conceptual learning, yet their involvement is often overlooked. She maintains a practice of ensuring students hold a seat at the table when districts determine policies and strategies, arguing that governance is incomplete without their direct representation.